← HALO home

Data Protection Impact Assessment

Last updated: September 29, 2026

This Data Protection Impact Assessment has been prepared by Khejan, LLC, d/b/a HALO, in accordance with Article 35 of the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 ("GDPR"). It assesses the risks to the rights and freedoms of individuals arising from the processing of personal data within the HALO application.

1. Assessment Overview

Project nameHALO (Holistic Ascension Life Optimization)
Date23 February 2026
AssessorHALO Data Protection Team
Review date23 August 2026 (6-month review cycle)
StatusApproved

2. Description of Processing

2.1 What data is processed?

Category Data Types Special Category?
Account dataName, email, hashed passwordNo
Health & wellbeingHydration, fitness, mood, sleep, pain, nutrition, energy, medications, triggersYes (Article 9 GDPR)
Financial dataAccounts, transactions, budgets, recurring expenses, debtNo (but sensitive)
Goals & habitsGoal details, habit tracking, streak dataNo
TasksTask details, priorities, time tracking, subtasksNo
FamilyMember names, events, meals, recipes, activities, memoriesNo
HomeMaintenance, projects, cleaning, documents, utilities, service providersNo
TechnicalSession cookies, IP addresses, browser type, access timestampsNo

2.2 Why is data processed?

2.3 How is data collected?

2.4 Who has access to the data?

Role Access Level
Data subject (user)Full access to their own data
Team members (if shared)Access governed by role: Admin, Member, or Viewer
System administratorsRestricted to operational necessity
Sub-processorsLimited to their specific function (see Section 5)

2.5 Data retention

3. Necessity and Proportionality Assessment

3.1 Lawful basis

Data Category Lawful Basis GDPR Article
Account dataContract performanceArticle 6(1)(b)
Health dataExplicit consentArticle 6(1)(a) + Article 9(2)(a)
Financial dataContract performanceArticle 6(1)(b)
Other module dataContract performanceArticle 6(1)(b)
Technical dataLegitimate interestArticle 6(1)(f)

3.2 Is the processing necessary?

Yes. Each category of data is directly necessary for providing the specific feature the user has chosen to use. Users select which modules to enable and voluntarily enter data into each module. No data is collected beyond what is required for the features in use.

3.3 Is the processing proportionate?

Yes. The following measures ensure proportionality:

4. Risk Assessment

4.1 Risk Matrix

Risk Likelihood Severity Overall Mitigation
Unauthorised access to health dataLowHighMediumEncryption at rest and in transit, role-based access, strong authentication
Data breach exposing financial dataLowHighMediumEncryption, Cloudflare DDoS protection, security monitoring, 72hr breach notification
Unauthorised access via stolen credentialsMediumHighMediumPassword hashing, session management, CSRF protection
Data lossLowMediumLowEncrypted backups, database redundancy
Cross-team data leakageLowMediumLowTeam-scoped queries, role-based policies on all models
Third-party sub-processor breachLowMediumLowDPA with all sub-processors, limited data sharing, encrypted tokens
Excessive data collectionVery LowMediumLowModule opt-in design, data minimisation principle
Re-identification of anonymised dataVery LowLowVery LowAggregated analytics only, no individual tracking

4.2 Special Category Data Risks (Health Data)

Health data poses elevated risk due to its sensitive nature under Article 9 of the GDPR.

Specific risks:

Specific mitigations:

5. Third-Party Sub-processor Assessment

5.1 Stripe (Payment Processing)

Data sharedBilling information, payment method details
Risk levelLow — Stripe is PCI DSS Level 1 certified
SafeguardsHALO never stores full card numbers; Stripe handles payment data directly
Transfer mechanismEU-US Data Privacy Framework

5.2 Cloudflare (Security & CDN)

Data sharedIP addresses, request metadata (as part of web traffic)
Risk levelLow — limited data exposure, security-focused processing
SafeguardsStandard Contractual Clauses in place
Transfer mechanismSCCs + supplementary measures

5.3 Google (Calendar Sync — Optional)

Data sharedCalendar event titles, dates, times, descriptions; OAuth tokens
Risk levelLow — optional integration, user-controlled
SafeguardsOAuth tokens encrypted at rest, user can disconnect at any time
Transfer mechanismEU-US Data Privacy Framework

6. Measures to Mitigate Risks

6.1 Technical Measures

6.2 Organisational Measures

6.3 User Controls

7. Conclusion

This assessment concludes that the processing of personal data within HALO can proceed, subject to the implementation and maintenance of the technical and organisational measures described in Section 6.

The residual risk to data subjects is acceptable given:

  1. Data minimisation is embedded in the application design
  2. Special category data (health) is processed only with explicit consent and additional safeguards
  3. Strong technical security measures are in place
  4. No data held in HALO is used for advertising, profiling, or sold to third parties; website ad measurement is limited to the consent-gated Meta pixel described in Section 3.3
  5. Users have full control over their data, including export and deletion

Review Schedule

This DPIA will be reviewed:

8. Contact

For questions about this assessment:

Email: privacy@halo.fit

Create your HALO account